In these occasions, double down — in your expertise, in your data, on you. Be part of us Aug. 8-10 at Inman Join Las Vegas to lean into the shift and be taught from the perfect. Get your ticket now for the perfect value.

Former Keller Williams CEO John Davis took goal at Gary Keller in a press launch Monday, alleging the Keller Williams co-founder runs the corporate “much like a felony enterprise.”

Davis’s announcement comes as a federal district courtroom in Fort Price, Texas, is deliberating whether or not to have Davis’s authorized claims in opposition to Keller, Keller Williams, and former KW President Josh Crew dealt with below arbitration.

Within the fall, Davis filed a lawsuit in what Davis mentioned is an effort to revive his repute after sexual misconduct allegations in opposition to him surfaced earlier in 2022 and to get better $300 million in damages. The Oct. 27 grievance additionally names Inga Dow, the CEO of a number of Keller Williams workplaces who lodged the allegations in opposition to Davis, as a defendant. On the finish of January, the courtroom refused Keller’s request to merge the fits filed by Davis and Dow, ruling that they’ll proceed as two separate circumstances.

In his go well with, Davis alleges he resigned from KW due to a disagreement with Keller over a enterprise technique that he believed would herald much less earnings to Keller Williams workplaces, and that Keller and Crew responded by smearing him and withholding Dow’s accusations from him when he was negotiating the sale of his KW market middle areas after his resignation, leading to tens of thousands and thousands in monetary losses.

“Mr. Davis seeks a trial by his friends to shine the sunshine on how Gary Keller, Josh Crew, and Keller Williams Realty leaders run their enterprise and hurt the very folks that made Gary Keller, Josh Crew and others rich,” mentioned Paul Omodt, spokesman for John Davis, within the announcement Monday. The discharge was issued by the regulation agency representing Davis, Nesenoff & Miltenberg.

“Our most up-to-date movement earlier than the courtroom seeks a public discussion board and argues in opposition to Keller Williams’ use of arbitration to protect its misdeeds publicly. Mr. Davis and his group imagine within the energy of their case and imagine Gary Keller and his scheme have equally harmed others.”

Keller Williams spokesperson Darryl Frost despatched Inman an emailed assertion on behalf of all of the KW defendants.

“Sadly, Mr. Davis is utilizing the courtroom system, and now his paid publicist, as a automobile to say unsubstantiated, unwarranted, and disparaging claims in opposition to Keller Williams,” Frost mentioned.

“We sit up for the chance to disclose his claims for what they’re — an try to misdirect consideration and lay blame the place it shouldn’t be.”

Keller, Keller Williams, and Crew filed a movement to compel arbitration in Davis’s case on Feb. 8, arguing that Davis signed “quite a few agreements” with the defendants that embrace arbitration clauses. On Feb. 13, Dow advised the courtroom she agreed with Keller Williams that Davis’s claims — together with these in opposition to her — ought to be resolved below arbitration.

However on Feb. 16, Davis advised the courtroom that an settlement he signed with Keller Williams on Nov. 4, 2020 “expressly cancels all earlier contracts and agreements.”

Furthermore, Davis’s attorneys argued that the arbitration settlement the defendants search to implement is “unconscionable” as a result of it’s designed to stop franchise house owners from suing and subsequently protecting Keller Williams’ alleged wrongdoings from coming to mild.

“Defendants are improperly attempting to silence Davis by broadening the phrases of the arbitration settlement, due to the potential for extra widespread litigation ensuing from the harms dedicated by Keller Williams and Gary Keller by means of the devaluation of many franchise house owners’ pursuits through the years,” the submitting reads.

“The KW Defendants’ current movement earlier than the Court docket — looking for to remain this case and compel arbitration — is an element and parcel of the KW Defendants’ calculated efforts to keep away from legal responsibility and deter others, together with KW franchise house owners, from asserting their authorized rights. Such reasoning for secrecy is in opposition to public coverage.”

Davis’s attorneys particularly slam Keller and the best way he operates Keller Williams.

“The KW Defendants, and extra notably Gary Keller, run Keller Williams much like a felony enterprise, whereby investments and pursuits are taken or devalued by means of illegal ways, whether or not by means of improper discount of market caps or different means, due to Gary Keller’s greed,” the submitting reads.

‘Franchise proprietor victims who’re focused by Gary Keller haven’t any selection however to just accept considerably lower than market worth affords or face shedding their investments by means of additional devaluation. A number of franchises are so considerably devalued by Gary Keller and Keller Williams that their house owners haven’t any selection however to surrender their investments. Gary Keller and people near him have largely profited by means of the devaluing of pursuits of franchise holders for a few years, and so they proceed to take action so far.”

Davis’s announcement Monday emphasised that the courtroom’s most up-to-date ruling denied Keller Williams’s “authorized maneuvers to maintain the case secret and hidden … in favor of the general public’s proper to know.”

That ruling was on Feb. 17 when the courtroom denied the Keller Williams defendants’ motions to seal each their movement to dismiss and the entire filings associated to their movement to compel arbitration, which is why the filings are publicly accessible.

In that very same order, Decide Reed O’Connor condemned “querulous conduct” and a “sample of abrasive conduct” from the entire events within the case and threatened the legal professionals concerned with sanctions for “[a]ny future deviations” from a “excessive normal {of professional} conduct.”

In a Feb. 20 reply to Davis’s submitting, attorneys for Keller, Keller Williams and Crew don’t tackle Davis’s allegations relating to the operation of Keller Williams. Fairly, they argue that Davis’s place that the topic arbitration settlement is unconscionable is “unsupported.”

“[T]right here is nothing within the Settlement’s arbitration provisions that’s ‘sufficiently stunning or gross to compel the courtroom to intercede,’ which is the usual for substantive unconscionability,” the submitting reads.

“Lastly, arbitration isn’t in opposition to public coverage,” the submitting continues. “It’s properly established that arbitration of disputes between events is strongly favored below federal and state regulation.”

Crew and Dow didn’t reply to requests for remark.

E-mail Andrea V. Brambila.

Like me on Fb | Observe me on Twitter